EXOPOLITICAL WAVES: The political implications of human activity beyond our planet, or in space, including the possibility of life beyond our planet (sentient or otherwise).
Suggested directions: Be critical, skeptical, thoughtful, and comment where it’s appropriate, then check for reactions (or the lack of it). Know the difference between hard and soft data. Challenge what appears as, or may be, disinformation.
OCCUPY INNER THROUGH OUTER SPACE (IN ALL DIMENSIONS)
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.
Astrobiology—the study of extraterrestrial life—has made great
strides since its 1960s origins, when the evolutionary biologist George
Gaylord Simpson derided it as “a science without a subject.” Today it is
booming as never before, driven by perennially high public interest and
steadily growing scientific respectability.
In a press conference last week two senior NASA officials—Ellen Stofan,
the agency’s chief scientist, and John Grunsfeld, the former astronaut
and associate administrator for NASA’s science programs—predicted that
astrobiologists would at last find their elusive alien subjects within
only a decade or two. Not long ago the prediction would have been bold
but now it seems almost passé, as more evidence mounts that the warm,
wet conditions for life as we know it prevail throughout the cosmos.
Surely simple, single-celled life should be common out there, waiting to
be found by a rover in subsurface brines on Mars or by a mission sent
to probe the oceans of the icy moons Europa or even via space telescopes
gazing at Earth-like planets orbiting faraway stars. NASA generously
funds all these efforts.
The possible existence of intelligent aliens and extraterrestrial
civilizations, on the other hand, remains much more controversial and is
scarcely funded at all. Even so, for more than a half-century a small,
scattered contingent of astronomers has gone against the grain, engaging
in a search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). SETI chiefly
looks for chatty cosmic cultures that might be beaming messages around
our region of the galaxy using radio waves or laser pulses. But its
interstellar eavesdropping has yet to detect any signals that withstand
close scrutiny. Even if brimming with life, to us, the galaxy seems to
be a very quiet, rather lonely place.
Now, new results suggest
this loneliness may extend out into the universe far beyond our galaxy
or, instead, that some of our preconceptions about the behaviors of
alien civilizations are deeply flawed. After examining some 100,000
nearby large galaxies a team of researchers lead by The Pennsylvania
State University astronomer Jason Wright has concluded that none of them
contain any obvious signs of highly advanced technological
civilizations. Published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,
it is by far the largest of study of its kind to date—earlier research
had only cursorily investigated about a hundred galaxies.
More heat than light
Unlike traditional SETI surveys, Wright and his team did not seek
messages from the stars. Instead, they looked for the thermodynamic
consequences of galactic-scale colonization, based on an idea put forth
in 1960 by the physicist Freeman Dyson. Dyson postulated that a growing
technological culture would ultimately be limited by access to energy,
and that advanced, energy-hungry civilizations would be driven to
harvest all the available light from their stars. To do that, they might
dismantle a planet or two as feedstock for building star-enveloping
swarms of solar collectors. A star’s light would fade as it was encased
in such a “Dyson sphere,”
but Dyson noted the constructions could be detected by the mid-infrared
glow of their radiated waste heat—essentially the same phenomenon that
causes your computer to warm up when it’s running. In 1963 the Russian
astronomer Nikolai Kardashev extended these ideas by developing a
tripartite classification system
for a civilization’s energy use. A “type 1” civilization would harness
all the energy of its home planet whereas a type 2 uses all the energy
of its star, perhaps by building a Dyson sphere around it. A type 3
civilization would be capable of using all the energy of its galaxy,
presumably by encasing all its stars in Dyson spheres.
Unable to secure funding from standard sources such as NASA or the
National Science Foundation, Wright’s group instead turned to the
Templeton Foundation, a private organization with a history of
supporting controversial and speculative research. With that funding the
team searched for type 3 civilizations in an all-sky catalogue from
NASA’s Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). They looked for
objects that were optically dim but bright in the mid-infrared—the
expected signature of a galaxy filled with starlight-absorbing,
heat-emitting Dyson spheres. After using software to automatically sift
through some 100 million objects in the WISE catalogue, Wright’s student
Roger Griffith examined the remaining candidates by hand, culling those
that weren’t galaxies or that were obvious instrumental artifacts.
The result was about 100,000 galaxies, with about 50 in particular that
emitted much more heat than light. Jessica Maldonado, a student at
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, then scoured the
astronomical literature to determine what was already known about those
top candidates. Many of them were well studied, and can be explained as
pairs of galaxies in the process of merging or as isolated “starburst”
galaxies—two processes that can heat galactic quantities of
light-blocking dust to generate powerful infrared glows. According to
the researchers, an additional 90 galaxies with less extreme
heat-to-light ratios warrant further study but, by and large, the
results are null. “On Kardashev’s scale, a type 3 civilization uses
energy equal to all the starlight produced by one galaxy,” Wright says.
That would equate to an infrared-bright galaxy seemingly bereft of
stars. “We looked at the nearest, largest 100,000 galaxies we could find
in the WISE catalogue and we never saw that. One hundred thousand
galaxies and not one had that signature. We didn’t find any type 3s in
our sample because there aren’t any.”
Even if advanced civilizations do not build Dyson spheres, Wright’s null
result also applies to any other energy-intensive “astroengineering”
taking place at galactic scales. “Looking for the absence of light as
well as the waste heat like Wright and his colleagues have done is
really cool,” says James Annis, an astrophysicist at the Fermi National
Accelerator Laboratory who in the late 1990s used different methods to
survey more than a hundred nearby galaxies for type 3s. “In some sense
it doesn’t matter how a galactic civilization gets or uses its power
because the second law of thermodynamics makes energy use hard to hide.
They could construct Dyson spheres, they could get power from rotating
black holes, they could build giant computer networks in the cold
outskirts of galaxies, and all of that would produce waste heat.
Wright’s team went right to the peak of the curve for where you’d expect
to see any sort of waste heat, and they’re just not seeing anything
obvious.”
Against the empire
The idea that there may be galactic empires out there to find at all
comes from seemingly reasonable extrapolations of our own situation here
on Earth.
We know that on at least one planet microbial life emerged, and that
life then ascended the evolutionary ladder to build large bodies,
brains, societies and eventually technologies that could take it to
other planets—maybe even other stars. If it happened here, why not on
any of the billions of other habitable planets astronomers now estimate
fill each galaxy? “Life, once it becomes spacefaring, looks like it
could cross a galaxy in as little as 50 million years,” Annis says. “And
50 million years is a very short time compared to the billion-year
timescales of planets and galaxies. You would expect life to crisscross a
galaxy many times in the nearly 14 billion years the universe has been
around. Maybe spacefaring civilizations are rare and isolated, but it
only takes just one to want and be able to modify its galaxy for you to
be able to see it. If you look at enough galaxies, you should eventually
see something obviously artificial. That’s why it’s so uncomfortable
that the more we look, the more natural everything appears.”
Over the years, researchers have created a vast assemblage of possible
explanations for SETI’s failure to find any aliens. Perhaps we are alone
or some restriction imposed by astrophysics and biology makes
intelligent life vanishingly rare or technological civilizations always
self-destruct or interstellar travel is simply too hard, too slow or too
boring. Annis suspects galaxy-sterilizing astrophysical explosions
called gamma-ray bursts, which were more frequent in the cosmic past,
until recently suppressed the rise of advanced civilizations and that we
inhabit “the beginning of history.”
But as rich as the scientific literature is with ideas, some of the most
fascinating ones come instead from science fiction. Drawing from Arthur
C. Clarke’s famous quip that “Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic,” in 2011 the science fiction author Karl
Schroeder coined an all-too-plausible reason for the apparent absence of
aliens: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
nature.” In this view the future of technology would not consist of
star-hopping civilizations spreading like wildfire through galaxies,
disassembling planets and smothering suns, but rather of slow-growing
cultures becoming more and more integrated with their natural
environments, striving for ever-greater efficiencies and coming
ever-closer to thermodynamic equilibrium. Simply put, profligate
galaxy-spanning empires are unsustainable and therefore we do not see
them. “SETI is essentially a search for technological waste products,”
Schroeder has written.
“Waste heat, waste light, waste electromagnetic signals—we merely have
to posit that successful civilizations don’t produce such waste, and the
failure of SETI is explained.”
According to David Brin, an astrophysicist who also authors best-selling
works of science fiction contemplating the “Great Silence” of the
universe, Wright’s expansive study leaves the possibility of Dyson
spheres open but may be the nail in the coffin for antiquated notions of
all-encompassing empires that tap entire galaxies for energy. “Why
would advanced beings need or want that?” Brin asks. “Only a stunningly
vast project would justify such greed…. There would be no more gentle,
welcoming systems like ours; all would be converted to industrial use.
It’s the trait of rapacious users who either have a big reason or a big
insatiability.”
Things to come
In 1973 Carl Sagan devised a more empirical formula for Kardashev’s
scale that allowed for finer gradations. Our current planetbound
civilization, he calculated, rated as a type 0.7 and would reach type 1,
given a few more centuries of sustained growth in energy use, which for
the past few centuries has increased by about 3 percent per year. To
sustain that trend, humanity would need to build a Dyson sphere of our
own within about a millennium, becoming a type 2, and would need to
encase most of the Milky Way’s stars in Dyson spheres a millennium after
that, becoming a type 3.
The implications are clear: Within the span of relatively few
generations—a brief moment in comparison with all of human
history—either we must rework the solar system and then a great deal of
the galaxy itself or our civilization must shift to a radically
different, less energy-intensive trend of growth. In the 1960s, during
the dizzying early days of the space age, it was easier to believe the
former was more likely; today, calamities both ecological and economical
make the latter seem more certain. This numerical prophecy of quieter,
slower growth, even stasis, is consistent with the null results from
traditional SETI searches as well as the rare, unorthodox Dysonian
searches of Wright, Annis and a few others.
Provided he can get more funding, Wright intends to perform follow-up
work investigating some of his survey’s strangest galaxies, looking for
civilizations further down the Kardashev scale. He also hopes to examine
a curious cluster of optically dark point sources just outside the
Milky Way’s galactic plane that his team discovered by their infrared
glows in the WISE data. The cluster is probably a previously unknown
giant molecular cloud, an unmapped stellar nursery filled with
protostars, Wright says. But “it’s also almost exactly what you’d expect
a cluster of Dyson Spheres to look like.” It seems Dyson’s dream is
still alive.
Dyson, now 91 but still eager to talk about SETI from his office at the
Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., says the null results
aren’t surprising but shouldn’t be discouraging. “Our imaginings about
the ways that aliens might make themselves detectable are always like
stories of black cats in a dark room,” Dyson says. “If there are any
real aliens, they are likely to behave in ways that we never imagined.
The WISE result shows that the aliens did not follow one particular
path. That is good to know. But it still leaves a huge variety of other
paths open. The failure of one guess does not mean that we should stop
looking for aliens.”
No comments:
Post a Comment